Improved summary

I think the following is an improvement.  Please post suggestions or comments.  

It is likely that most, if not all, diagnosed diseases are fictions used to control and reduce populations.  First, when one looks into a microscope one is focusing on something within the microscope (and the lenses of ones own eye), not what is on the slide because the object on the glass slide is beyond the focal length of the eye and would, in any case, be obscured by the lenses of the microscope.  Second, the size a cancer or viral cell is said to be means it would be unable to do harm, no matter how many there are.  Third, there is no explanation of how the instructions or information within DNA would alter living matter.   Diseases weaken and kill because of fear and policies to suppress appetite and otherwise cause harm. 

First, the microscope acts similarly to a kaleidoscope.  Microscopes would not be able to view objects the size of cancer, viral or Ebola cells because the image would blur at the magnifications needed (as one can see from using a camera, which can bring things closer but not magnify without losing clarity, so that what one cannot see with the eye alone is not likely to exist).  When someone looks into a traditional microscope, they are not, in any case, focusing on the material on the glass slide.   The process of squinting reduces the focal length so that they would not see what is on the slide even if it would otherwise be visible beyond the lenses of the microscope.  What they are observing when looking into a microscope is the moving lenses of the eye overlaying a similar but fixed, projected and illuminated object, whether or not it is a glass lens or some other translucent object, at the lower end of the microscope but before the final glass apertures.  The magnification is relatively low and achieved by the eye alone and by the placing of the second translucent object or glass at an appropriate distance from the eyepiece so that the microscope acts in a way that is similar to  a kaleidoscope (or telescope).  That one sees the lenses of the eye and of the lower microscope lens instead of the further object on the glass slide can be tested by removing the slide or rotating the final lenses and observing that the image remains the same.   That the magnification is relatively low, or at least no greater than that which can be achieved by the eye itself can be seen by squinting at any light source with the eye alone, when the lenses of the eye  projected and illuminated in front resemble the fixed lower image one sees looking into a microscope. 

Second, something as small as a cancer or viral or Ebola cell would not be able to travel or survive in the fluids and fluctuations of the human body or, even if it were able to, cause harm, no matter how many cells there are (as being stung by a large number of small wasps will not hurt in the same way as being stung by one large wasp and may have a protective effect, in the same way as a first injury to the body may lessen the impact of the second).  

Third, there is no satisfactory philosophical or scientific explanation of how the information, or instructions, contained within DNA, said to be present in every cell of the human body, can interact with and change living matter (which, other than the brain, is not said to be conscious and therefore able to ‘read’ the instructions), in other words, by what mechanism, or mechanical link, and using what force, or, if it can, in a way that is different to or greater than those changes caused by environmental factors such as nutrition or physical injury or ageing.  

Diagnosed diseases kill because of factors such as fear and fatalism, inadequate nutrition (eg, food that is too salty), gas emissions (which suppress appetite as well as weakening the body), alcohol and tobacco, and extremes of temperature.  Clausewitz said war was a continuation of policy by other means, but science fiction, eg, disease, is likely also to be a policy of war, intended to dominate nature (knowledge of whose intelligence has also been suppressed), promote secularism, and control and reduce populations.   For example, it seems unlikely that the earth would rotate at 66,600 miles per hour around the sun or, even if it did (in some sort of cocoon), at the same time rotate at 1,000 miles per hour on its axis.  If the atmosphere moved at the same speed, birds would have to fly against a 1,000 mile per hour wind or, if the atmosphere did not move, they would find themselves 0.28 miles along the road a second after they had ascended vertically into the air.