Summary of argument

It is likely that most, if not all, diagnosed diseases are fictions used to control and reduce populations.  First, when one looks into a microscope one is focusing on something within the microscope, not what is on the slide, because the material on the glass slide is beyond the focal length of the eye and would, in any case, be obscured by the lenses of the microscope.  Second, the size a cancer or viral cell is said to be means it would be unable to do harm, no matter how many there are.  Third, there is no explanation of how the instructions or information within DNA would alter living matter.   Diseases kill because of policies to suppress appetite and otherwise cause harm, including by causing fear.

First, the microscope acts similarly to a kaleidoscope.  Microscopes would not be able to view objects the size of cancer, viral or Ebola cells because the image would blur at the magnifications needed (as one can see from using a camera, which can bring things closer but not magnify without losing clarity, so that what one cannot see with the eye alone is not likely to exist).  When someone looks into a traditional microscope, they are not, in any case, focusing on the material on the glass slide, even if the slide were sufficiently well lit and even if one’s view were not obstructed, and nor is an image of the material projected onto the screen one sees within the cylinder of the microscope, as can be observed by removing the slide, when the image remains the same.    What they are observing when looking into a microscope  may include the translucent and magnified lenses of their own eye but overlaying a similar looking but more crowded, relatively fixed, projected and illuminated image, whether or not it is a lens (which examination of the ends of the objective lenses suggests) or some other translucent object (at the lower end of the microscope but before the final objective lenses).   Any magnification within the microscope is relatively low, ie, not significantly greater than that which can be achieved by the eye alone.   This is supported by the fact that, for example, the ribbon-like objects on the screen are of a similar size to those of the lens of one’s eye that one sees in front of one in the cylinder, which are themselves not much bigger than when one views them with the eye alone when squinting into sunlight or another bright light.  This is what one would expect, given that a camera blurs at a relatively low magnification. 

Second, something as small as a cancer or viral or Ebola cell would not be able to travel or survive in the fluids and fluctuations of the human body or, even if it were able to, cause harm, no matter how many cells there are (as being stung by a large number of small wasps will not hurt in the same way as being stung by one large wasp and may have a protective effect, in the same way as a first injury to the body may lessen the impact of the second).    Third, there is no satisfactory philosophical or scientific explanation of how the information, or instructions, contained within DNA, said to be present in every cell of the human body, can interact with and change living matter (which, other than the brain, is not said to be conscious and therefore able to ‘read’ the instructions), in other words, by what mechanism, or mechanical link, and using what force, or, if it can, in a way that is different to or greater than those changes caused by environmental factors such as nutrition or physical injury or ageing.  

Diagnosed diseases kill because of factors such as fear and fatalism, inadequate nutrition (eg, food that is too salty), gas emissions (which suppress appetite as well as weakening the body), alcohol and tobacco, and extremes of temperature.  Clausewitz said war was a continuation of policy by other means, but science fiction, eg, disease, is likely also to be a policy of war, intended to dominate nature (knowledge of whose intelligence has also been suppressed), promote secularism, and control and reduce populations.   For example, it seems unlikely that the earth would rotate at 66,600 miles per hour around the sun or, even if it did (in some sort of cocoon), at the same time rotate at 1,000 miles per hour on its axis.  If the atmosphere moved at the same speed, birds would have to fly against a 1,000 mile per hour wind or, if the atmosphere did not move, they would find themselves 0.28 miles along the road a second after they had ascended vertically into the air.